Iroquois vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,642,091 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.575% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1,574.8 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $33,009, a difference of 18.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,321, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $76,226, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,992, a difference of 0.30%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $72,225, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,234, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.7%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 58.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.98%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 97.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 84.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 60.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 100.1%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 65.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 59.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 88.7%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 45.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.24%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.43%).