Iroquois vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,466,072 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.852. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 229.4 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $53,154, a difference of 35.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $116,328, a difference of 33.3%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $120,487, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,389, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $44,169, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 49.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 36.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.8%).