Iroquois vs Filipino Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Filipino
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Filipinos
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Filipino Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,410,526 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.814. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 344.9 Filipinos.
Iroquois vs Filipino Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $115,509, a difference of 55.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $134,910, a difference of 54.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $128,723, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 18.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $57,740, a difference of 21.9%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $49,508, a difference of 36.0%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $59,066 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $138,397 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $115,509 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $61,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $74,224 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $49,508 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $57,740 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $128,723 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $134,910 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $76,686 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 29.7% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 89.6%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 83.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.5%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 24.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 31.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 71.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 66.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 51.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.55%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 20.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 115.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 104.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.8% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 89.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 75.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 71.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 59.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 52.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 23.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 3.4% |
Iroquois vs Filipino Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 78.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 58.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.7%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Filipino |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |