Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,723,368 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 92.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,911, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $82,070, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,596, a difference of 4.5%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $95,114, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.8%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 107.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.5%).