Iroquois vs Lumbee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Lumbee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Lumbee
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lumbee Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,957 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.420% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 2,419.8 Lumbee.
Iroquois vs Lumbee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $60,305, a difference of 38.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $34,584, a difference of 37.0%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $54,644, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $32,500, a difference of 12.0%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $36,876, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 17.6%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $29,845 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $68,679 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $54,644 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $36,876 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $41,715 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $32,500 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $34,584 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $60,305 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $65,113 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $40,550 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 73.7%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 69.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 24.1%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 35.3%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 20.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 23.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 31.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 33.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 31.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 31.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 30.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 25.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 33.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 28.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 43.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 19.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 57.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 56.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 70.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 75.6% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.90%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 39.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 39.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Average 10.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Good 55.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 23.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 85.7% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 83.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 80.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 54.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 48.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 34.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 24.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.1% |
Iroquois vs Lumbee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.3%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.9%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Lumbee |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 32.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.0% |