Iroquois vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,743,412 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.278% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 277.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $71,021, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $89,919, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $105,149, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $41,017, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,461, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.65%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.0%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.3%).