Iroquois vs Aleut Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,542,768 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.067% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 67.4 Aleuts.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $62,708, a difference of 16.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $100,052, a difference of 14.7%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,446, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,168, a difference of 3.6%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $44,241, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 45.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.9%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.7%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.16%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%).