Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Congo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Congo
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,014,996 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 28.2 Immigrants from Congo.
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $72,178, a difference of 15.9%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $77,850, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $51,393, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $34,317, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $39,169, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $35,720 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $82,216 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $66,768 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $39,169 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $44,204 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $34,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $43,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $72,178 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $77,850 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $51,393 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 24.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 22.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 22.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 41.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.6%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 39.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 41.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 36.8% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 52.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.9%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 61.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 41.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.8%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Congo |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |