Iroquois vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Macedonians

Fair
Excellent
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,661,158 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 7.2 Macedonians.
Iroquois Integration in Macedonian Communities

Iroquois vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $107,074, a difference of 22.7%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $90,761, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $101,882, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,286, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $61,564, a difference of 14.6%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricIroquoisMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
28.6%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.43%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.0%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisMacedonian
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.9%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.80%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisMacedonian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.5%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 37.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisMacedonian
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
27.9%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.5%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.5%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Iroquois vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%).
Iroquois vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisMacedonian
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%