Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Germany
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Germany

Fair
Good
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,453
SOCIAL INDEX
62.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
153rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Germany Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,283,059 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Immigrants from Germany.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Germany Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,282, a difference of 18.4%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $45,751, a difference of 17.0%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $86,764, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,190, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,603, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 9.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$45,751
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Excellent
$105,507
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Good
$86,764
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Excellent
$47,566
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Excellent
$56,542
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Average
$39,603
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$51,190
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Good
$95,913
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Excellent
$103,282
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Excellent
$62,544
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Good
16.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.11%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Poor
32.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
92.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Good
60.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Good
38.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Germany Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Germany
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.5%