Iroquois vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,307,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $104,560, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $87,769, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $106,597, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,724, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,336, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 31.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.8%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 19.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.68%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.6%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.0%).