Iroquois vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,472,085 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 48.6 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $37,072, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $34,677, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $83,588, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,681, a difference of 0.10%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $82,062, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 29.2%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.87%), poverty (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 50.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.2%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.37%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.76%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%).