Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,709,588 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.832. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.609% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1,609.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,266, a difference of 12.4%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $47,482, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,023, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $84,914, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $41,737, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 33.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), poverty (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.4%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.92%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 5.6%).