Iroquois vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,230,653 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 13.3 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $108,692, a difference of 24.6%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $48,116, a difference of 23.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $91,339, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,898, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,923, a difference of 12.4%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.3%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.6%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.63%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.8%).