Iroquois vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,049,176 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 48.0 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $33,378, a difference of 9.1%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $39,721, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,366, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,217, a difference of 0.98%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $83,953, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.33%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.9%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.070%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.62%).