Iroquois vs Mongolian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Mongolian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Mongolians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mongolian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,455,798 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 27.3 Mongolians.
Iroquois vs Mongolian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $111,602, a difference of 27.9%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $114,553, a difference of 26.5%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $93,971, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,540, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,542, a difference of 16.9%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $49,173 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $114,553 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $93,971 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $51,038 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $60,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $42,542 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Good $52,540 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $104,578 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $111,602 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $65,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Poor 26.6% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 36.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.86%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 87.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 66.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 53.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Iroquois vs Mongolian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.9%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Mongolian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |