Iroquois vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,045,798 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.053% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 52.5 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $34,974, a difference of 11.8%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $45,538, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,022, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,279 compared to $74,217, a difference of 0.080%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,420, a difference of 0.59%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $85,965, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.17%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 92.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 4.3%).