Iroquois vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,101,273 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 23.1 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $88,388, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,412, a difference of 18.5%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $46,213, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,440, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,353, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 22.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.5%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.3%).