Iroquois vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,732,828 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 14.3 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $50,575, a difference of 29.3%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $95,146, a difference of 28.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $111,286, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,294, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,446, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.8%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.14%), family households (62.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 61.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.3%).