Iroquois vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,579,817 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.944. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.288% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 288.2 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $88,934, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $104,408, a difference of 19.7%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $46,700, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,483, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $48,356, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 25.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.80%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.2%).