Iroquois vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,772,435 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.361% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 360.8 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $70,094, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $82,474, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,430 compared to $42,151, a difference of 0.66%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $82,604, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $48,516, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 35.2%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 68.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 72.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.5%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 125.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.3%).