Iroquois vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,375,007 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $99,933, a difference of 34.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $116,566, a difference of 33.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $110,787, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $56,379, a difference of 19.0%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $44,198, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 42.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.5%), family households (62.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 51.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%).