Iroquois vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,619,707 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.313% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 312.6 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,105, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $95,512, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $84,740, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $55,924, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $42,412, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.8%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (44.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.7%), college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.4%).