Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Guatemala
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,971,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,447, a difference of 8.6%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,244, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.40%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,573, a difference of 0.79%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $75,123, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $37,550 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $87,191 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $75,123 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $40,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $46,244 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $35,444 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Poor $51,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $81,341 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $86,573 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $53,950 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 24.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Good 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 81.1% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 37.5% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.38%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 90.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 91.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 90.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 89.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 87.4% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 85.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 84.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 81.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 77.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 38.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 30.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |