Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Guatemala

Fair
Poor
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,971,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,447, a difference of 8.6%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,244, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.40%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,573, a difference of 0.79%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $75,123, a difference of 1.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$37,550
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$87,191
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$75,123
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$40,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$46,244
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$35,444
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Poor
$51,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$81,341
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$86,573
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$53,950
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
24.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
42.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
37.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.38%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 90.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
91.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
90.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
89.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
87.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
85.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
84.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
81.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
77.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
56.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
38.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
30.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Guatemala
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%