Iroquois vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,991,048 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.290. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 22.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $99,093, a difference of 13.6%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $101,634, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $93,694, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,436, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $57,975, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,026, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.72%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.2%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.6%).