Iroquois vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,160,501 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.289% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 289.0 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $55,543, a difference of 17.2%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $84,011, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $98,340, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $41,495, a difference of 6.1%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,376, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 37.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.38%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 49.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.22%), disability (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.5%).