Iroquois vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,229,762 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $112,484, a difference of 28.9%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $115,395, a difference of 27.5%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $49,448, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,552, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,108, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.8%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.3%).