Iroquois vs Immigrants Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,140,492 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.772. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.273% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 273.4 Immigrants.
Iroquois vs Immigrants Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $85,818, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $99,943, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $94,423, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.19%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,328, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,478, a difference of 9.5%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Fair $43,010 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $100,962 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Good $85,818 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Average $46,478 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Average $54,168 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Fair $39,328 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $53,201 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Average $94,423 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Average $99,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Fair $59,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.1% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 16.9%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (44.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.33, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.33 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Fair 32.7% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.97%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 92.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 91.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 89.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 85.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 57.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Poor 44.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Fair 36.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Average 1.8% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Poor 2.5% |