Iroquois vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,933,959 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.781. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.241% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 240.9 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $90,261, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $105,070, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $56,052, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,234, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $47,628, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 37.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 37.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 21.3%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.30, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).