Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,142,619 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 17.4 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,722, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $80,341, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,030, a difference of 0.54%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $50,474, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $92,837, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 13.2%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 117.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.7%).