Iroquois vs South American Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
South American
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
South Americans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,097
SOCIAL INDEX
48.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
186th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
South American Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,470,465 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 28.0 South Americans.
Iroquois vs South American Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $86,824, a difference of 16.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $100,837, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $95,362, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,698, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,804, a difference of 10.3%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | South American |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Good $44,114 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $101,856 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Good $86,824 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Good $46,804 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Average $54,492 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Average $39,698 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $53,939 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Good $95,362 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Average $100,837 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Fair $59,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Iroquois vs South American Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.94%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | South American |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Good 16.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Average 16.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Excellent 16.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 12.4% |
Iroquois vs South American Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | South American |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.7% |
Iroquois vs South American Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | South American |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 33.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Iroquois vs South American Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | South American |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Average 46.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Fair 46.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Average 31.8% |
Iroquois vs South American Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | South American |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Iroquois vs South American Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | South American |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Poor 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Fair 59.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Good 47.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 15.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Iroquois vs South American Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | South American |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |