Iroquois vs South American Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

South Americans

Fair
Average
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,097
SOCIAL INDEX
48.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
186th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South American Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,470,465 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 28.0 South Americans.
Iroquois Integration in South American Communities

Iroquois vs South American Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $86,824, a difference of 16.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $100,837, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $95,362, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,698, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,804, a difference of 10.3%).
Iroquois vs South American Income
Income MetricIroquoisSouth American
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Good
$44,114
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Fair
$101,856
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Good
$86,824
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Good
$46,804
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Average
$54,492
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Average
$39,698
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$53,939
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Good
$95,362
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Average
$100,837
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Fair
$59,854
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Excellent
25.0%

Iroquois vs South American Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.94%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Iroquois vs South American Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisSouth American
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Average
13.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Good
16.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Average
16.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
12.4%

Iroquois vs South American Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Iroquois vs South American Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisSouth American
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.7%

Iroquois vs South American Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Iroquois vs South American Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisSouth American
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
33.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Iroquois vs South American Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Iroquois vs South American Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisSouth American
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Average
46.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Average
31.8%

Iroquois vs South American Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Iroquois vs South American Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisSouth American
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.6%

Iroquois vs South American Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
Iroquois vs South American Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisSouth American
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Poor
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Fair
59.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
15.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Iroquois vs South American Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%).
Iroquois vs South American Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisSouth American
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%