Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Thailand

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,331,591 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Immigrants from Thailand.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,327, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $60,217, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $97,400, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,810, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,645, a difference of 6.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Poor
$42,289
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Poor
$99,840
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Fair
$83,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Fair
$45,598
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Poor
$52,908
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Poor
$38,810
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$50,645
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Poor
$91,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Poor
$97,400
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Fair
$60,217
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
24.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
12.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.9%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 16.6%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
45.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Poor
32.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.9%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.32%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Thailand
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%