Iroquois vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,724,052 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.800. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.601% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1,601.0 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 54.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $72,093, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $30,343, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $50,547, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $44,356, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $77,044, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 61.9%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 50.8%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.66%), currently married (44.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 66.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.87%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.0%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.5%).