Iroquois vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,090,471 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.978. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.689% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 689.4 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $78,045, a difference of 7.2%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $47,070, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,104 compared to $38,848, a difference of 0.66%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,017, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $89,285, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.40%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.9%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.17%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.7%).