Iroquois vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,547,179 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 191.2 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.6%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $31,729, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $76,605, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,012, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $35,266, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $49,234, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 73.6%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 70.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.95%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 242.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 238.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 210.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.0%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.82, a difference of 21.1%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.9%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.3%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and 9th grade (95.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.4%).