Iroquois vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,152,991 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 78.0 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.7%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,895, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,437, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $55,598, a difference of 3.5%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $93,988, a difference of 3.8%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,376, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.0%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), poverty (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 125.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 57.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.0%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.5%).