Iroquois vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,628,138 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 165.7 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $57,953, a difference of 48.2%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $126,620, a difference of 39.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $115,947, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $56,660, a difference of 19.6%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $46,573, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 50.3%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 43.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 86.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 48.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.5%).