Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Poland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Poland

Fair
Good
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,802
SOCIAL INDEX
75.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
104th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Poland Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,256,175 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Immigrants from Poland.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Poland Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $90,549, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $106,319, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $101,065, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $61,041, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,630, a difference of 14.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$45,979
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Exceptional
$108,570
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$90,549
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Exceptional
$49,633
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Exceptional
$58,452
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Exceptional
$41,630
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$55,474
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$101,065
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Exceptional
$106,319
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Average
$61,041
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
26.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 32.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
28.9%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Fair
10.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Poor
54.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.1%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Good
39.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Good
15.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Poland Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Poland
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%