Iroquois vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,072,865 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.049% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1,049.5 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,275, a difference of 12.4%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $79,737, a difference of 7.3%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,215, a difference of 0.32%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,372, a difference of 0.69%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,904, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 26.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.9%), family households (62.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.36, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (44.7% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.37%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.3%).