Iroquois vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,598,275 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $62,330, a difference of 16.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,713, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $88,446, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,163, a difference of 0.15%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,748, a difference of 0.76%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $43,393, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 15.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.83%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 80.2%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 72.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.7%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and family households (62.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.4%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.27%), female disability (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.8%).