Iroquois vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,110,820 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 205.4 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,071, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $85,681, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $37,904, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,493, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,315, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.7%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.9%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.24%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%).