Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Sub-Saharan Africans

Fair
Tragic
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,121,622 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Iroquois Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,391, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,615, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $84,235, a difference of 0.66%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $50,408, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $40,152, a difference of 2.7%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), male disability (13.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisSubsaharan African
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%