Iroquois vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Cherokee

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,667,321 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.647% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 646.7 Cherokee.
Iroquois Integration in Cherokee Communities

Iroquois vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.3%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $37,203, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $34,742, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,133, a difference of 0.74%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,848, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,125, a difference of 1.3%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricIroquoisCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.5%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.91%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.2%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisCherokee
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.73%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
79.0%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.8%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.82%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Iroquois vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Iroquois vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisCherokee
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%