Iroquois vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,733,319 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 60.1 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $50,914, a difference of 30.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $111,454, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $114,826, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,737, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,099, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 12.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 58.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.2%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%).