Iroquois vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,145,666 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.968. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.327% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 326.7 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $49,302, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $109,198, a difference of 25.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $112,151, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,307, a difference of 12.5%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,319, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 25.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.8%).