Iroquois vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Latvians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,507,305 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Latvians.
Iroquois vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $52,649, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $115,957, a difference of 32.9%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $120,301, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,783, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,941, a difference of 20.7%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 27.9% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.7%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.8%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 37.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.1% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 69.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Iroquois vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.9%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |