Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from El Salvador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from El Salvador

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,506,028 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.109% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 108.6 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,599, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $81,213, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,430 compared to $42,413, a difference of 0.040%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,673, a difference of 0.73%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $38,394, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$38,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$92,545
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$81,213
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$42,413
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$47,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$36,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$54,599
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$86,913
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$93,176
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$58,226
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.14%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.0%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.9%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 14.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.49, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
67.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
44.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
43.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
36.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Average
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 106.0%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
94.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
93.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
90.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
90.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
89.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
86.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
85.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
83.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
80.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
77.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
56.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from El Salvador
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.5%