Iroquois vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,306,498 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 247.2 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,682, a difference of 18.8%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $106,144, a difference of 17.2%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $86,084, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,802, a difference of 6.6%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,865, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,127, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 55.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 53.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 30.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.08, a difference of 2.5%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 70.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%).