Iroquois vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,891,483 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 51.0 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $96,292, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $112,796, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $107,650, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,179, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,835, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 39.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.0%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 47.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%).