Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Central American Indians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
506
SOCIAL INDEX
2.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
344th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Central American Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,458,053 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $128,140, a difference of 55.6%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $56,709, a difference of 50.4%), and median household income ($74,847 compared to $111,519, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $62,083, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $71,567, a difference of 34.4%).
Income Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,699 | Exceptional $56,709 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,034 | Exceptional $131,067 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,847 | Exceptional $111,519 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,474 | Exceptional $59,433 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,433 | Exceptional $70,146 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,930 | Exceptional $49,818 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,643 | Exceptional $62,083 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,355 | Exceptional $128,140 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,764 | Exceptional $127,500 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,232 | Exceptional $71,567 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Good 25.5% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 92.4%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 87.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 36.3%).
Poverty Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.3% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 65.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.4% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.9% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 30.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.7% | Tragic 71.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.5% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 65.3%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 56.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Exceptional 49.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.35 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.0% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.62%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.7% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.5% | Tragic 52.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.0% | Fair 19.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Good 6.5% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 81.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 76.5%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 89.7% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.2% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.2% | Average 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.0% | Exceptional 71.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.8% | Exceptional 55.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%).
Disability Metric | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 0.95% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.5% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |